David Bailey’s Nakamoto Bitcoin Treasury Announces 1-for-40 Reverse Split
- Stacey George
- May 20, 2026
- News
- 0 Comments
Nakamoto Bitcoin Treasury, the publicly traded company led by David Bailey, has announced a 1-for-40 reverse stock split. The move will consolidate every 40 existing shares into a single new share, a corporate action that follows stockholder approval.
What Nakamoto Bitcoin Treasury Announced
Nakamoto, trading under the ticker NAKA, confirmed the 1-for-40 reverse split in a statement distributed via Stock Titan. The company said the action follows a stockholder vote authorizing the consolidation.
A corresponding filing appears on the SEC’s EDGAR database, documenting the corporate action. The 1-for-40 ratio is notably aggressive; most reverse splits use ratios between 1-for-5 and 1-for-20.
One analysis from Bitcoin Treasuries described the situation as a “treasury in freefall,” pointing to potential Nasdaq delisting pressure as a driving factor behind the consolidation.
What a 1-for-40 Reverse Split Means for Shareholders
In a reverse stock split, a company reduces its total outstanding share count while proportionally increasing the per-share price. At a 1-for-40 ratio, a shareholder who previously held 400 shares would hold 10 shares after the split takes effect.
The arithmetic does not, on its own, change the total value of a holder’s position. If a share traded at $0.50 before the split, the post-split price would adjust to roughly $20.00 per share, all else being equal. Market movement after the effective date can shift that price in either direction.
Companies typically pursue reverse splits to meet minimum bid-price requirements for continued listing on exchanges like Nasdaq. Readers following how regulatory frameworks intersect with crypto-linked equities, such as the EU’s ongoing MiCA review consultation, may recognize similar compliance pressures across jurisdictions.
What Readers Should Watch Next
Investing.com reported the split could take effect as soon as Thursday, though readers should verify timing through Nakamoto’s formal SEC filings.
Updated share-conversion details, including treatment of fractional shares, should appear in subsequent regulatory filings. Any official explanation for the rationale, whether tied to exchange listing requirements or capital structure goals, would clarify the company’s forward strategy.
For those tracking how public companies navigate crypto treasury structures alongside evolving state-level crypto legislation like South Carolina’s S.163, Nakamoto’s next moves offer a reference point. The company’s situation also highlights broader questions about how Bitcoin-focused firms manage equity compliance during periods when institutional interest in digital assets continues to grow globally.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.